FL findlemonlaw.com
Utah · Topic Updated May 26, 2026

Remedies: What You Can Recover Under Utah Lemon Law

Refund (with distinctive mileage-exclusion-during-repair) or replacement under § 13-20-5, the UCSPA $2,000 statutory floor + discretionary fees, and the § 13-20-6 discretionary Lemon Law fees + federal Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) mandatory-character fees framework.

Utah remedies follow the standard refund/replacement architecture but with two distinctive features: a mileage-exclusion-during-repair formula (consumer-favorable) and a state-law fee framework where both bases (UCSPA § 13-11-19 and Lemon Law § 13-20-6) are discretionary, so the reliable fee anchor is the federal Magnuson-Moss claim. The UCSPA does add a useful $2,000 statutory-damages floor.

How the remedies stack

  • § 13-20-5 refund or replacementmanufacturer’s choice (joins OK/SC/AR/MS manufacturer-option tier).
  • Mileage offset — measured from first-report miles; vehicle-in-repair mileage EXCLUDED (distinctive consumer benefit); also excludes mileage at delivery.
  • § 13-20-6 DISCRETIONARY attorney fees — Lemon Law lodestar; court may grant or deny.
  • § 13-11-19 UCSPA actual damages OR $2,000 (whichever greater) statutory floor + discretionary prevailing-party fees — a useful parallel damages theory.
  • Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) mandatory-character federal fees + UCC § 70A-2-725 4-year SOL backstop — the reliable fee anchor.

The distinctive UCSPA $2,000 floor

Utah’s UCSPA private right of action recovers the GREATER of:

  • Actual damages, OR
  • $2,000 (a flat per-action floor, recovered once).

The $2,000 floor is the statutory alternative to actual damages, not a per-violation penalty that multiplies with the number of deceptive acts. For multi-act deceptive conduct, the additional acts strengthen the actual-damages case, but the statutory floor itself is a single figure. Utah’s floor is consumer-favorable relative to states with no statutory-damages alternative, though it is a per-action minimum rather than a per-violation civil penalty like Oklahoma OCPA § 761.1 or Alabama ADTPA § 8-19-10(a)(2). Utah’s $2,000 floor is most valuable for cases where actual damages may be ambiguous.

The distinctive mileage-exclusion-during-repair

Utah’s § 13-20-5 “reasonable allowance for use” formula explicitly excludes mileage during repair periods. For consumers with multi-week dealer visits and extended parts-wait periods, this can substantially reduce the offset compared to peer-state percentage-based or flat-per-mile formulas that count all pre-first-report mileage.

Topics in this section

  • Refund (repurchase) — § 13-20-5 refund math with distinctive repair-period mileage exclusion.
  • Replacement — Manufacturer-option replacement vehicle.
  • Cash-and-keep — Negotiated cash settlement where consumer keeps the vehicle.
  • UCSPA damages — § 13-11-19 actual damages OR $2,000 (whichever greater), plus discretionary prevailing-party fees.
  • Attorney fees — Discretionary § 13-20-6 + discretionary § 13-11-19 UCSPA + mandatory-character federal Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) (the reliable anchor).

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.