Minnesota Lemon Law

Minnesota’s lemon law — codified at Minn. Stat. § 325F.665 — pairs a 2-year Rights Period (or the express-warranty term, whichever ends first; there is no statutory mileage cap) with a manufacturer-run informal dispute settlement (IDS) program that the statute requires under subd. 6. Distinctively, Minnesota has a 1-attempt serious safety defect rule under § 325F.665 subd. 3 — joining only Georgia and Virginia in the small group of states with one-attempt safety thresholds. Combined with § 325F.665 subd. 9 attorney-fee recovery plus the unusual Minnesota Private Attorney General Statute under Minn. Stat. § 8.31 subd. 3a (providing additional fee recovery for violations of any law the AG enforces), Minnesota is solidly consumer-favorable.

Minnesota is distinctive in four ways:

1. 1-attempt serious safety defect rule under § 325F.665 subd. 3(b)(2) — joins Georgia and Virginia as one of only three states with a one-attempt safety threshold. Stronger than peer states which require 2-4 safety attempts.
2. Manufacturer-run IDS prerequisite under § 325F.665 subd. 6 — Minnesota has no state lemon-law board; the required arbitration is the manufacturer’s own informal dispute settlement program (typically BBB Auto Line), and its decision is nonbinding unless both parties agree.
3. § 325F.665 subd. 9 attorney fees + Minnesota Private AG Statute (§ 8.31 subd. 3a) — dual fee-recovery basis. The Private AG Statute is unique to Minnesota — providing a private right of action plus attorney fees for any violation of a law the Attorney General has authority to enforce (including the Lemon Law and Consumer Fraud Act).
4. 30-business-day OOS threshold under § 325F.665 subd. 3(b)(3) — uses business-day counting (joins Colorado, Massachusetts, and North Carolina at ~42 calendar days; more consumer-favorable than 30-calendar-day jurisdictions).

This page is the hub for our Minnesota coverage. Use the topic guides for deeper reading:

• The Law — § 325F.665 Lemon Law, Consumer Fraud Act + Private AG Statute, Magnuson-Moss, repair-attempt presumption (1-attempt safety, 4-attempt, 30 business days OOS), and statute of limitations.
• The Process — Documented repair attempts, written notice, manufacturer IDS, court action, and CFA-parallel claims.
• Remedies — Refund, replacement, CFA + Private AG Statute damages, § 325F.665 subd. 9 fees.
• Qualifying Defects — Defect categories that meet Minnesota’s “substantially impair” test under § 325F.665.
• Vehicle Types — Used vehicles, leases, EVs, motorcycles (Polaris/Indian home-state defendant!), RVs, commercial vehicles.
• Manufacturers — Common case patterns by brand in the Minnesota market.
• FAQ — Common questions about Minnesota lemon-law claims.

Who’s protected

Minnesota’s Lemon Law (Minn. Stat. § 325F.665 subd. 1(c)) covers:

• New motor vehicles purchased or leased in Minnesota for personal, family, or household use.
• Demonstrators sold under new-vehicle warranties.
• Motorcycles — explicitly covered (relevant given Polaris/Indian Medina HQ).
• Subsequent transferees during the warranty period.

The statute excludes motor homes (except chassis), commercial vehicles, and vehicles weighing more than 10,000 lbs GVWR.

The 2-year window

Minnesota’s eligibility window under § 325F.665 is the term of the applicable express warranties OR 2 years following the date of original delivery, whichever is earlier. Unlike many peer states, Minnesota sets no statutory mileage cap — the window is purely time-based:

• Georgia, North Carolina, New Jersey, Texas, Washington, Arizona: 24 months / 24,000 miles
• Minnesota: 2 years (or warranty term), no mileage cap
• Ohio: 12 months / 18,000 miles
• Other 1-year states: MI, MA, WI, CO

Outside the 2-year window, Minnesota CFA (6-year SOL) and Magnuson-Moss (4-year limit) remain available.

The 1-attempt serious safety defect rule — distinctive

§ 325F.665 subd. 3(b)(2) provides a distinctive consumer-favorable feature: only one repair attempt is required for a “serious safety defect” — defined as a defect that is life-threatening or substantially impairs the consumer’s ability to control or operate the vehicle.

This rule joins:

• Georgia § 10-1-783(b) — 1-attempt safety rule.
• Virginia § 59.1-207.13(B)(2) — 1-attempt safety rule.
• Minnesota § 325F.665 subd. 3(b)(2) — 1-attempt safety rule.

Only these three states have one-attempt safety thresholds — the strongest consumer protection of any state for serious safety defects.

The “reasonable number of attempts” test

Minnesota applies thresholds under § 325F.665 subd. 3(b):

• One repair attempt for a serious safety defect under subd. 3(b)(2); OR
• Four or more repair attempts for the same nonconformity under subd. 3(b)(1); OR
• 30 or more cumulative business days out of service under subd. 3(b)(3).

See our repair-attempt presumption article.

Manufacturer informal dispute settlement (IDS)

Minnesota does not run a state arbitration board. Under § 325F.665 subd. 6, each manufacturer must operate or participate in an informal dispute settlement (IDS) mechanism in Minnesota that meets 16 C.F.R. Part 703 — typically BBB Auto Line. Key features:

• Run by the manufacturer’s designated program, not the state.
• Fee capped at the conciliation court filing fee for the county where the arbitration is held.
• Both parties may be represented by an attorney.
• Nonbinding unless the parties agree otherwise — any party may remove the decision to district court for a trial de novo.

If the manufacturer has a qualifying IDS procedure under subd. 6 (meeting 16 C.F.R. Part 703), the consumer generally must use it before suit.

See manufacturer IDS article.

What you can recover

A successful Minnesota Lemon Law case typically produces:

• Refund — purchase price, sales tax, license fees, plus incidental costs, minus reasonable use deduction.
• Replacement — comparable new vehicle.
• § 325F.665 subd. 9 attorney fees (costs, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees in a civil action).
• CFA actual damages + Private AG Statute § 8.31 subd. 3a fees (court only).
• Reimbursement of incidental damages.

What to do next

1. Document everything. See our evidence guide.
2. Stay within the 2-year window (or the warranty term, whichever ends first).
3. For serious safety defects — one attempt is enough.
4. Send written notice with the final repair opportunity.
5. Use the manufacturer’s IDS program (e.g., BBB Auto Line) where required before suit.
6. File court action with parallel CFA + Private AG Statute claims for additional fee recovery.
7. Get a free case review from a Minnesota lemon-law attorney.

Explore Minnesota lemon law

Topic

The Law: Minnesota Lemon Law, CFA, and Private AG Statute

The statutes behind a Minnesota lemon-law claim — § 325F.665 Lemon Law, Consumer Fraud Act, the Minnesota Private Attorney General Statute (§ 8.31 subd. 3a), Magnuson-Moss, and timing rules.

Read → Topic

The Minnesota Lemon Law Process

Step-by-step: how a Minnesota lemon-law case moves through repair attempts, written notice, the manufacturer's informal dispute settlement program, court action, and settlement.

Read → Topic

Minnesota Lemon Law Remedies

What you can recover under Minnesota's lemon-law framework — refund, replacement, cash-and-keep, CFA damages, and § 325F.665 subd. 9 + Private AG Statute § 8.31 subd. 3a attorney-fee recovery.

Read → Topic

Qualifying Defects Under Minnesota Lemon Law

What kinds of vehicle defects qualify for a Minnesota Lemon Law refund — the substantial-impairment test under Minn. Stat. § 325F.665.

Read → Topic

Vehicle Types Covered by Minnesota Lemon Law

How Minnesota's Lemon Law applies to used cars, leases, EVs, motorcycles (Polaris/Indian home state!), RVs, and commercial vehicles.

Read → Topic

Minnesota Lemon Law Cases by Manufacturer

How the Minnesota Lemon Law and CFA apply to specific manufacturers.

Read → Topic

Minnesota Lemon Law — Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the most-asked questions about Minnesota's Lemon Law, CFA, and Private AG Statute.

Read →