FL findlemonlaw.com
New Hampshire · Article Updated May 26, 2026

Replacement Vehicle Under the New Hampshire Lemon Law

When a New Hampshire lemon-law claim results in a comparable replacement vehicle — at the consumer's election within 30 days of the Arbitration Board decision.

A New Hampshire claim can resolve with a comparable replacement vehicle instead of a refund. Under RSA 357-D:3, V, the consumer elects — within 30 days of the Arbitration Board decision — between refund and replacement.

What “comparable” means

A replacement vehicle should be:

  • The same make and model (or substantially similar).
  • Comparably equipped — trim, options, features.
  • New and equivalent in value.

The consumer’s election

New Hampshire gives the consumer the choice — refund or replacement — exercised within 30 days of a favorable Board decision. This is more consumer-favorable than the manufacturer-option structure of New Mexico or Oklahoma.

When replacement makes sense

  • You like the model and want a non-defective one.
  • A replacement avoids re-shopping and re-financing.
  • The defect is a one-off build issue.

When to take the refund instead

  • You’ve lost confidence in the model line.
  • You want to exit the brand.
  • The refund (full price minus the small 100,000-mile offset) is worth more to you.

Registration and fees

A proper replacement should not cost you a second round of registration fees — these collateral charges are part of what the manufacturer makes you whole on. (New Hampshire has no sales tax, so there’s no sales-tax exposure either way.)

Bottom line

Replacement is one of two statutory outcomes under RSA 357-D, with the consumer electing within 30 days of the Board decision. Either way, CPA recovery can stack where the facts support it. Get a free case review.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.