FL findlemonlaw.com
Mississippi · Article Updated May 26, 2026

Used Vehicles Under Mississippi Lemon Law

Mississippi has NO separate Used Car Lemon Law. Used buyers rely on Magnuson-Moss, UCC § 75-2-314 implied merchantability, and structurally narrowed MCPA — particularly for Hurricane Katrina flood-vehicle non-disclosure paradigm cases.

Mississippi’s Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act covers new vehicles only. Mississippi has no separate Used Car Lemon Law comparable to New Jersey § 56:8-67, New York GBL § 198-b, Massachusetts § 7N¼, or Connecticut § 42-221. Used-vehicle buyers rely on three other theories.

Three pathways for used-vehicle claims

1. Magnuson-Moss if still under warranty

If the used vehicle is still under the manufacturer’s original new-car warranty, Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(1)(B) applies fully:

  • Federal cause of action.
  • Mandatory § 2310(d)(2) attorney fees.
  • 4-year UCC SOL backstop under Miss. Code § 75-2-725.
  • Federal venue in S.D. Miss. or N.D. Miss.

2. UCC § 75-2-314 implied merchantability

Every dealer sale carries implied warranty of merchantability. To disclaim, § 75-2-316 requires:

  • Conspicuous “as-is” language.
  • Specific disclaimer.
  • Buyer’s actual notice.

Boilerplate “as-is” buried in fine print often fails the conspicuousness requirement. The 4-year SOL under § 75-2-725 runs from delivery.

3. Narrowed MCPA for non-disclosure

The cleanest post-narrowing § 75-24-15 MCPA fact patterns involve used-vehicle non-disclosure:

Hurricane Katrina (2005) flood-vehicle non-disclosure paradigm

Mississippi’s distinctive used-vehicle exposure. Hurricane Katrina flooded approximately 600,000 vehicles in Gulf Coast LA/MS regions. Many were title-laundered through cross-state inspections and entered the used-vehicle market without disclosure. Even 20 years later, residual Katrina-flood vehicles continue to surface in MS used inventory.

For these cases:

  • Actual financial loss = the buyback discount on a properly-disclosed flood vehicle.
  • Reliance = absence of damage disclosure on title/Carfax.
  • Strong settlement leverage under MCPA + UCC + Magnuson-Moss parallel theories.

Mississippi Delta flood-vehicle non-disclosure

Mississippi River and tributary flooding (Yazoo, Holmes, Sharkey, Issaquena, Sunflower counties) creates ongoing flood-vehicle exposure. The Yazoo River 2019 backwater flood produced large-scale undisclosed-flood-vehicle exposure.

Undisclosed buyback resale

§ 63-17-159(c) requires disclosure of repurchased vehicles on resale. Violation = MCPA + Lemon Law parallel claim.

Misrepresented CPO status

Vehicle sold as “Certified Pre-Owned” without manufacturer inspection.

Odometer rollback

Federal Truth in Mileage Act + MCPA parallel.

”As-is” disclaimers under § 75-2-316

Many MS used-vehicle sales include “as-is” language. To be effective under § 75-2-316, the disclaimer must be conspicuous and specifically disclaim the implied warranty of merchantability. Boilerplate disclaimers often fail.

When the original manufacturer’s warranty is still active

The dealer’s “as-is” disclaimer does NOT disclaim the manufacturer’s warranty. Magnuson-Moss applies fully. The consumer can pursue the manufacturer directly and the dealer as a separate defendant for misrepresentation.

Bottom line

MS used-vehicle buyers have no Lemon Law claim but have meaningful protection via Magnuson-Moss + UCC implied merchantability + narrowed MCPA. The cleanest cases involve Hurricane Katrina flood-vehicle non-disclosure, Mississippi Delta flooding, undisclosed buyback resale, misrepresented CPO status, and odometer rollback. Federal Magnuson-Moss venue is essential for fee economics.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.