Montana's Repair-Attempt Presumption (4 Attempts / 30 Business Days)
How Montana presumes a reasonable number of attempts — 4 same-defect repairs or 30 cumulative business days out of service — and the written-notice prerequisite.
Montana presumes a “reasonable number of attempts” under Mont. Code Ann. § 61-4-504 when one of two thresholds is met within the warranty period (2 years or 18,000 miles, whichever earlier) — after the consumer has given written notice of the nonconformity.
The two thresholds
| Test | Threshold |
|---|---|
| Same nonconformity, repair attempts | 4 or more (and it persists) |
| Cumulative business days out of service | 30 or more |
Either threshold, met within the warranty period, raises the presumption.
No one-attempt safety rule
Unlike Maine and Idaho (one attempt for a serious braking/steering failure) or Hawaii (one attempt for any serious safety defect), Montana has no reduced threshold for serious defects — every defect must reach 4 attempts or 30 business days. A safety defect still strengthens the overall case.
The written-notice prerequisite
Montana requires the manufacturer to clearly and conspicuously disclose that written notification of a nonconformity is required before a consumer may be eligible for a refund or replacement (§ 61-4-502(3)). Give the manufacturer written notice of the defect — and keep proof — before pursuing the remedy.
The 18,000-mile window
Because the warranty period ends at the earlier of two years or 18,000 miles, and Montana’s rural drivers rack up miles quickly, the presumption must be satisfied before the odometer reaches 18,000. Track both the calendar and the mileage closely. See statute of limitations.
What counts as a repair attempt
- Vehicle was at the manufacturer or an authorized dealer, documented by a repair order.
- The same nonconformity persists.
- “No problem found” visits count if the defect was reported.
- Independent-mechanic visits and routine maintenance don’t count.
The nonconformity must substantially impair the vehicle
Meeting a threshold isn’t enough on its own — the defect must substantially impair the use, market value, or safety of the vehicle. The manufacturer can rebut by showing the problem doesn’t rise to that level, or resulted from abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modification. Clean documentation defeats these.
Bottom line
Four same-defect repairs or 30 cumulative business days out of service — within the 2-year/18,000-mile warranty period, after written notice — raises Montana’s presumption. There’s no one-attempt safety shortcut, and the 18,000-mile cap closes fast for high-mileage drivers, so document carefully and act early.
Related
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act in Montana
How the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301) supplements Montana's lemon law — federal-court access in D. Mont., § 2310(d)(2) attorney fees, and a 4-year runway.
Read → ArticleThe Montana Consumer Protection Act (§ 30-14-133)
How the Montana Consumer Protection Act (§ 30-14-101, private action § 30-14-133) overlays the lemon law — discretionary treble damages, discretionary fees with caps, and the per se lemon-law violation.
Read → ArticleThe Montana Lemon Law (Mont. Code Ann. § 61-4-501)
Montana's New Motor Vehicle Warranty Act in detail — the 2-year/18,000-mile period, the 4-attempt / 30-business-day presumption, the manufacturer-elected remedy, the 100,000-mile offset, and in-state arbitration.
Read → ArticleStatute of Limitations for Montana Lemon Law Claims
Timing rules for Montana vehicle claims — the 2-year/18,000-mile warranty period (and the mileage trap), the in-state arbitration, and the CPA and Magnuson-Moss clocks.
Read →Think you've got a lemon?
Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.