FL findlemonlaw.com
Montana · Article Updated May 26, 2026

Cash-and-Keep Settlements in Montana

How cash-and-keep settlements work in Montana lemon-law cases — a negotiated cash payment where you keep the vehicle, common when the defect is real but livable.

A cash-and-keep settlement is a negotiated payment from the manufacturer in exchange for the consumer keeping the vehicle and releasing the claim. It is not a statutory remedy under § 61-4-503 — which provides refund or replacement — but it’s a common practical resolution, and one a consumer can steer toward in a manufacturer-election state.

When cash-and-keep fits

  • The defect is real but livable — annoying or value-reducing, not safety-critical.
  • You want to keep the vehicle.
  • The diminished value is quantifiable.
  • The case is stronger on CPA facts than on a clean buyback.

How the cash amount is set

  • Diminished market value from the defect.
  • A discount off a full refund reflecting that you keep the car.
  • CPA actual damages, with a discretionary treble where willful conduct supports it (no dollar cap).
  • Attorney fees the manufacturer pays separately (CPA § 30-14-133 / Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2)).

Typical cash-and-keep payments range widely — often $3,000–$12,000 — depending on the vehicle, defect, and strength of the CPA facts.

Advantages

  • Keep the vehicle you’ve adapted to.
  • Faster than a full buyback negotiation.
  • Cash in hand plus a usable car.

Disadvantages

  • You keep a vehicle with a known defect.
  • Usually less than a full refund net of the use offset.
  • Not appropriate for serious safety defects — push for refund/replacement.

Bottom line

Cash-and-keep is a negotiated outcome for livable defects, and the CPA/Magnuson-Moss fee exposure keeps manufacturers at the table. For safety defects, push for a refund or replacement. Get a free case review.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.