Remedies: What You Can Recover Under Missouri Lemon Law
Refund, replacement, MMPA punitive damages (post-2020 SB 591), and the mandatory § 407.579 + § 407.025(1) attorney fees recovery.
Missouri’s Lemon Law (§ 407.560) and the MMPA overlay (§ 407.010) produce a strong remedy package: refund or replacement, MMPA punitive damages under § 407.025(1) (post-SB 591 standards), and mandatory attorney fees under two statutes.
The five primary remedies
- Refund (buyback) — Full purchase price, sales tax, registration, finance charges, incidental costs, minus reasonable use deduction under § 407.567.
- Replacement vehicle — Comparable new vehicle (the manufacturer elects “at its option” between refund and replacement under § 407.567).
- Cash and keep (settlement) — Diminished-value settlement common in pre-IDS negotiations.
- MMPA damages — Actual damages + punitive damages under § 407.025(1) + mandatory attorney fees (post-2020 SB 591 standards).
- Attorney fees — Mandatory § 407.577 Lemon Law fees + mandatory MMPA § 407.025(1) fees + Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) fees.
Refund / replacement math
Under § 407.567, the refund must include:
- Full purchase price (or lease payments + residual)
- Sales tax + registration / title fees
- Finance charges + interest paid
- Incidental damages (rental, towing, diagnostic fees)
- LESS: reasonable use offset
Missouri courts typically use a 120,000-mile life-expectancy denominator (consistent with peer states).
MMPA — the leverage layer (post-2020)
MMPA adds:
- Actual damages for deceptive practices.
- Punitive damages under § 407.025(1) — discretionary, requires meeting post-SB 591 standards.
- Mandatory attorney fees on prevailing.
- 5-year SOL under § 516.120(2).
- Heightened pleading requirements post-SB 591.
The 2020 SB 591 reforms narrowed MMPA but did not eliminate it. Vehicle defect cases with documented ascertainable loss (purchase price, repair costs, diminished value, lost-use damages) remain MMPA-actionable.
Attorney fees — dual mandatory basis
| Statute | Standard | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| § 407.577 | Mandatory | Prevailing on Lemon Law |
| MMPA § 407.025(1) | Mandatory | Prevailing on MMPA |
| Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) | Mandatory | Prevailing under MMWA |
This makes Missouri a strong fee-shifting jurisdiction — three independent mandatory bases.
Related
Missouri Lemon Law FAQ
Common Missouri lemon-law questions — when is a car a lemon, MMPA after SB 591, do I need a lawyer, what about used cars.
Read → TopicManufacturer Case Patterns in Missouri
Common Missouri lemon-law case patterns by manufacturer — Ford (Kansas City Claycomo home plant), GM (Wentzville home plant), Toyota, Honda, Tesla.
Read → TopicThe Process: Filing a Missouri Lemon Law Claim
The step-by-step Missouri lemon-law process — repair attempts, written notice, BBB Auto Line IDS, court action, and MMPA-parallel claims.
Read → TopicQualifying Defects: What Counts as a Lemon in Missouri
Defect categories that meet Missouri's 'substantially impair use, market value, or safety' test under § 407.567.
Read → TopicThe Law: Missouri Lemon Law, MMPA, and Magnuson-Moss
The statutes behind a Missouri lemon-law claim — § 407.560 Lemon Law, MMPA (§ 407.010) after 2020 SB 591 reforms, Magnuson-Moss, and timing rules.
Read → TopicVehicle Types Covered Under Missouri Lemon Law
How Missouri's Lemon Law applies to used vehicles, leases, EVs, motorcycles, RVs, and commercial vehicles. Ford KC Claycomo + GM Wentzville home-state plants.
Read →Think you've got a lemon?
Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.