FL findlemonlaw.com
Minnesota · Article Updated May 24, 2026

Replacement Vehicle Under Minnesota Lemon Law

When and how the manufacturer must provide a replacement vehicle under Minnesota's Lemon Law — substantially identical comparable model.

Under Minn. Stat. § 325F.665 subd. 3(d), the consumer may elect a replacement vehicle instead of a refund when the Lemon Law standard is met.

What “comparable” means

Minnesota requires a substantially identical new vehicle:

  • Same make, model, model year (or current year if older is unavailable).
  • Same trim and major options.
  • Comparable color (if available).

What the manufacturer must provide

  • A comparable new vehicle.
  • New manufacturer warranty.
  • Sales tax differential paid (if any).
  • Title and registration properly transferred.

What the consumer keeps

  • The full new-vehicle warranty period restarts.
  • Plate transfer where eligible.

What the consumer surrenders

  • The original defective vehicle.
  • Original title.
  • Original registration.

When replacement makes sense

  • Low mileage on the original vehicle.
  • Strong loyalty to the brand / model.
  • The defect is a manufacturing issue not tied to the specific build slot.

When refund makes sense over replacement

  • The defect is endemic to the model line.
  • The vehicle’s market value has declined.
  • The consumer wants to switch brands.
  • Substantial mileage accumulated.

Tax treatment

Minnesota motor vehicle sales tax was paid on the original purchase. For the replacement:

  • The manufacturer pays the sales tax differential (if any).
  • License transfers handled administratively.
  • Title transfer between consumer and manufacturer.

Mechanics

  1. Manufacturer IDS decision, settlement, or court order documented.
  2. Manufacturer locates suitable replacement vehicle.
  3. Delivery scheduled.
  4. Title and registration transfer.
  5. Original vehicle surrendered.
  6. New warranty period begins.

Total time: 6-12 weeks for manufacturer IDS; 4-8 weeks for court settlement.

Bottom line

Replacement is often a good outcome for low-mileage Minnesota vehicles with isolated defects. When the defect pattern is endemic to a model line, refund is typically the better choice.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.