FL findlemonlaw.com
Maine · Article Updated May 26, 2026

Replacement Vehicle Under the Maine Lemon Law

When a Maine lemon-law claim results in a comparable replacement vehicle — at the consumer's election, with the right to reject a replacement for a refund.

A Maine claim can resolve with a comparable replacement vehicle instead of a refund. Under Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 10 § 1163(2), the consumer elects — and “may reject any offered replacement and receive instead a refund.”

What “comparable” means

A replacement vehicle should be:

  • The same make and model (or substantially similar).
  • Comparably equipped — trim, options, features.
  • New and equivalent in value.

The consumer’s election and veto

Maine gives the consumer the choice and an explicit right to reject a replacement for a refund (§ 1163(2)) — more consumer-favorable than the manufacturer-option structure of New Mexico or Oklahoma. You decide refund vs. replacement when you file your AG arbitration application or lawsuit.

When replacement makes sense

  • You like the model and want a non-defective one.
  • A replacement avoids re-shopping and re-financing.
  • The defect is a one-off build issue.

When to reject and take the refund

  • You’ve lost confidence in the model line.
  • You want to exit the brand.
  • The refund (full price minus the 10%-capped offset) is worth more to you.

Tax and registration

A proper replacement should not cost you a second round of sales tax or registration — these collateral charges are part of what the manufacturer makes you whole on.

Bottom line

Replacement is one of two statutory outcomes under § 1163, with the consumer electing — and Maine expressly lets you reject a replacement for a refund. Either way, the AG-arbitration extras and UTPA recovery can stack. Get a free case review.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.