Replacement Vehicle Under Kentucky Lemon Law
How a replacement vehicle works under KY Lemon Law § 367.842 — comparable new vehicle, when consumer prefers replacement, when refund is the better choice.
Under Ky. Rev. Stat. § 367.842, the consumer may receive a replacement vehicle (a comparable new motor vehicle) instead of a refund. The choice is generally the consumer’s — unlike South Carolina’s § 56-28-40 manufacturer-option structure.
What counts as a “comparable” replacement
The statute requires “comparable” — typically interpreted as:
- Same model line.
- Equivalent trim level.
- Equivalent options package.
- Same or newer model year — if same model year is no longer in production, next available production year is typically substituted at no charge.
When to choose replacement over refund
Replacement is often preferred when:
- The consumer is otherwise satisfied with the model and just wants a non-defective unit.
- Market price for the vehicle has risen — refund at original price wouldn’t buy a comparable vehicle.
- Sales-tax avoidance is meaningful — replacement typically doesn’t trigger new sales tax. For high-value vehicles (Lexus ES, Corvette, Super Duty F-Series), savings of $2,000-5,000.
- Financing simplicity — existing financing typically transfers to the replacement.
- No re-shopping burden.
When to choose refund over replacement
Refund is often preferred when:
- The consumer no longer trusts the model or manufacturer.
- The consumer wants a different vehicle type.
- Market depreciation favors cash recovery and re-purchase.
- The financing terms are unfavorable.
The replacement process
- Agreement on comparable specifications.
- Locating the replacement — inventory search or scheduled production (2-12 weeks waiting).
- Title transfer.
- Vehicle exchange at the original dealer or designated location.
- Documentation update — registration, insurance, financing transfer.
Reasonable allowance for use on replacement
The KY statute is silent on whether reasonable allowance for use applies to replacement. In practice:
- Most replacements proceed without explicit allowance.
- Some manufacturers apply a use-credit or “use fee.”
- For high-mileage cases, manufacturer may request partial cash payment.
Options or upgrades
If the same model is no longer available:
- Upgrade: manufacturer may offer next-trim-up at no charge.
- Newer model year: typically substituted at no charge.
- Different model line: more complex — usually requires consumer agreement.
If consumer wants to upgrade trim or add options:
- Consumer typically pays the difference.
Replacement and existing financing
For financed vehicles:
- Consumer’s existing loan typically transfers to the replacement.
- Refinancing generally not required.
- Insurance — VIN update required.
For leased vehicles (covered for lessees after July 15, 1998):
- Lease transfer — captive finance typically transfers the lease with VIN substitution.
- Same payment — monthly payment typically unchanged.
- Residual value — recalculated.
Tax treatment
Replacement vehicles in KY typically:
- No new sales tax — because no new purchase transaction.
- No new title fee — typically just title-substitution fee.
- No new registration fee — typically just VIN-substitution paperwork.
When replacement is not practical
- Model discontinuation — refund usually the only option.
- Significant price difference — manufacturer’s “comparable” offering costs substantially more or less.
- Consumer trust loss — refund is the cleaner exit.
Home-state OEM replacement dynamics
For KY home-state OEM cases:
- Toyota TMMK Georgetown (Camry, RAV4 Hybrid, Lexus ES) — typically maintains substantial inventory for replacement.
- Ford LAP (Escape, Lincoln Corsair) — typically maintains substantial inventory.
- Ford KTP Louisville (Super Duty F-Series, Expedition, Lincoln Navigator) — heavy-duty truck replacement often longer lead time.
- GM Bowling Green Corvette — Corvette replacement lead times can be substantial (allocation-limited).
Bottom line
Replacement under § 367.842 is a clean option for KY consumers who want a non-defective version of the same vehicle. The choice between refund and replacement is generally the consumer’s. For Corvette and other allocation-limited home-state vehicles, replacement lead times can be substantial — refund may be the cleaner exit.
Related
Attorney Fees in Kentucky Lemon Law Cases
KY's distinctive double-discretionary fee structure: § 367.844 Lemon Law fees DISCRETIONARY + § 367.220(3) KCPA fees DISCRETIONARY. Federal Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) fees are LOAD-BEARING for KY contingency-fee economics.
Read → ArticleCash-and-Keep Settlements in Kentucky Lemon Law Cases
Cash-and-keep settlements in KY lemon-law cases — consumer keeps the vehicle, manufacturer pays a settlement. KCPA punitive-damages exposure shapes settlement dynamics.
Read → ArticleKCPA Damages in Kentucky Lemon Law Cases
How KCPA damages stack on top of Lemon Law recovery — actual damages + PUNITIVE DAMAGES under § 367.220(1) where malice/oppression/fraud evidence supports + discretionary § 367.220(3) attorney fees. Distinctive among UDAPs.
Read → ArticleRefund (Repurchase) Under Kentucky Lemon Law
How a KY Lemon Law refund works under § 367.842 — full purchase price + collateral + incidental damages, less reasonable allowance for use. Consumer typically chooses between refund and replacement.
Read →Think you've got a lemon?
Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.