Remedies: What You Can Recover Under Indiana Lemon Law
Refund, replacement, IDCSA treble damages (with cure notice), and the mandatory § 24-5-13-22 + § 24-5-0.5-4(d) attorney fees recovery.
Indiana’s Lemon Law (§ 24-5-13) and the IDCSA overlay (§ 24-5-0.5) produce a strong remedy package: refund or replacement, IDCSA treble damages or $500 minimum (provided cure notice given), and mandatory attorney fees under two statutes.
The five primary remedies
- Refund (buyback) — Full purchase price, sales tax, registration, finance charges, incidental costs, minus reasonable use deduction under § 24-5-13-14.
- Replacement vehicle — Comparable new vehicle (consumer chooses between refund and replacement under § 24-5-13-13).
- Cash and keep (settlement) — Diminished-value settlement common in pre-IDS negotiations.
- IDCSA damages — Actual damages + treble or $500 minimum under § 24-5-0.5-4(a) (uncured incurable acts) + mandatory § 24-5-0.5-4(d) attorney fees.
- Attorney fees — Mandatory § 24-5-13-22 Lemon Law fees + mandatory IDCSA § 24-5-0.5-4(d) fees + Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) fees.
Refund / replacement math
Under § 24-5-13-14, the refund must include:
- Full purchase price (or lease payments + residual)
- Sales tax + registration / title fees
- Finance charges + interest paid
- Incidental damages (rental, towing, diagnostic fees)
- LESS: reasonable use offset
Indiana courts typically use a 120,000-mile life-expectancy denominator (consistent with peer states).
IDCSA — the multiplier layer
IDCSA adds:
- Actual damages for deceptive practices.
- Treble damages or $500 minimum under § 24-5-0.5-4(a) — discretionary, requires uncured incurable deceptive act.
- Mandatory attorney fees under § 24-5-0.5-4(d).
- 2-year SOL under § 24-5-0.5-5(b).
- Pre-suit cure notice under § 24-5-0.5-5(a)(2) — required for treble damages.
The cure-notice requirement is the procedural key. Get the notice right, and IDCSA treble damages attach to manufacturers who refuse to cure.
Attorney fees — dual mandatory basis
| Statute | Standard | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| § 24-5-13-22 | Mandatory | Prevailing on Lemon Law |
| IDCSA § 24-5-0.5-4(d) | Mandatory | Prevailing on IDCSA |
| Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2) | Mandatory | Prevailing under MMWA |
This makes Indiana a strong fee-shifting jurisdiction — three independent mandatory bases.
Related
Indiana Lemon Law FAQ
Common Indiana lemon-law questions — when is a car a lemon, the IDCSA cure notice, do I need a lawyer, what about used cars.
Read → TopicManufacturer Case Patterns in Indiana
Common Indiana lemon-law case patterns by manufacturer — Toyota (Princeton home plant), Subaru (Lafayette SIA), GM (Fort Wayne), Honda (Greensburg), plus Elkhart RV manufacturers.
Read → TopicThe Process: Filing an Indiana Lemon Law Claim
The step-by-step Indiana lemon-law process — repair attempts, Lemon Law written notice, IDCSA cure notice, BBB Auto Line IDS, court action.
Read → TopicQualifying Defects: What Counts as a Lemon in Indiana
Defect categories that meet Indiana's 'substantially impair use, market value, or safety' test under § 24-5-13.
Read → TopicThe Law: Indiana Lemon Law, IDCSA, and Magnuson-Moss
The statutes behind an Indiana lemon-law claim — § 24-5-13 Lemon Law, IDCSA (§ 24-5-0.5) cure-notice + treble damages, Magnuson-Moss, and timing rules.
Read → TopicVehicle Types Covered Under Indiana Lemon Law
How Indiana's Lemon Law applies to used vehicles, leases, EVs, motorcycles, RVs (Elkhart-built home-state defendants!), and commercial vehicles.
Read →Think you've got a lemon?
Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.