FL findlemonlaw.com
Hawaii · Article Updated May 26, 2026

What If the Manufacturer Denied My Hawaii Lemon Law Claim?

What to do when a manufacturer denies a Hawaii lemon-law claim — common defenses, the written-report issue, SCAP arbitration, and court with UDAP treble.

A manufacturer denial is not the end of a Hawaii claim — you have the fast SCAP arbitration and, in court, the UDAP § 480-13 automatic treble. Denials usually rest on a handful of defenses.

Common denial reasons

  • “Defect doesn’t substantially impair use or value.”
  • “Caused by abuse, neglect, or unauthorized modification.”
  • “You didn’t report the nonconformity in writing during the Rights Period” (defeating the presumption).
  • “Not enough attempts” or “outside the Rights Period.”
  • “No problem found.”

How to respond

  1. Get the denial in writing.
  2. Assemble your documentation — repair orders, the business-day count (parts delays), and the written report.
  3. Confirm the written report during the Rights Period — it’s a presumption prerequisite.
  4. Demand SCAP arbitration — fast (45 days) and cheap; a participating manufacturer is bound by the decision.
  5. Pull TSBs and recalls — they undercut “abuse”/“no problem found” and support a UDAP theory.
  6. File court action for UDAP automatic treble and mandatory fees — within 1 year of the Rights Period’s end.

A denial can strengthen your case

Where the manufacturer denies despite documented knowledge (TSBs, recalls, warranty records), the denial supports a UDAP treble theory; for elders (62+), the $5,000 enhancement adds leverage.

Bottom line

A denial is common and rebuttable. Confirm the written report, document the defect (parts delays count), demand SCAP or file in court for UDAP treble, and act within the deadline. Get a free case review.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.