Attorney Fees in Florida Lemon Law Cases

The Florida Lemon Law itself does not shift attorney fees from the consumer to the manufacturer through the arbitration process. This is a major structural difference from California’s § 1794(d) and similar to Texas’s framework.

But Florida consumers can recover attorney fees through two parallel statutes: the FDUTPA and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Combined with the Lemon Law arbitration process for the substantive refund or replacement, these create the de facto Florida equivalent of California’s fee-shifting framework.

Three statutes, three approaches to fees

Statute	Attorney fees	Where pursued
Florida Lemon Law (Fla. Stat. § 681)	No	Manufacturer arbitration → NMVA Board
FDUTPA (Fla. Stat. § 501.2105)	Discretionary but routinely awarded	Florida civil court
Magnuson-Moss (15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(2))	Discretionary but commonly awarded	Federal or state civil court

FDUTPA’s attorney-fee provision

Fla. Stat. § 501.2105(1) provides:

In any civil litigation resulting from an act or practice involving a violation of this part, except as provided in subsection (5), the prevailing party, after judgment in the trial court and exhaustion of all appeals, if any, may receive his or her reasonable attorney’s fees and costs from the nonprevailing party.

The 2018 amendment shifted FDUTPA fees from “shall be awarded” (mandatory) to “may receive” (discretionary). However, Florida courts routinely award fees to prevailing consumers as a matter of judicial discretion. In practice, fees are recoverable in nearly every successful FDUTPA case.

In Florida lemon-law FDUTPA actions, attorney-fee awards typically range:

• Settlement cases (most): $20,000-$50,000.
• Tried cases: $50,000-$150,000+.
• Complex cases with extensive discovery: $100,000+.

These amounts are paid by the manufacturer in addition to the consumer’s damages.

Magnuson-Moss fee provision

15 U.S.C. § 2310(d)(2) provides:

If a consumer finally prevails in any action brought under paragraph (1) of this subsection, he may be allowed by the court to recover as part of the judgment a sum equal to the aggregate amount of cost and expenses… unless the court in its discretion shall determine that such an award of attorneys’ fees would be inappropriate.

Federal language is discretionary but routinely awarded.

How fee-shifting changes Florida case dynamics

Without fee-shifting, Florida lemon-law cases would be economically problematic for many consumers:

• Case value (refund + minor damages) may be $25,000-$60,000.
• Legal fees through trial could exceed $50,000.
• Consumer net: minimal or negative.

With FDUTPA/Magnuson-Moss fee-shifting:

• Refund: $25,000-$60,000.
• FDUTPA actual damages: similar.
• Attorney fees: paid by manufacturer.
• Consumer net: substantial recovery, no out-of-pocket legal cost.

Contingency representation in Florida

Most experienced Florida lemon-law attorneys work on a modified contingency:

• No fee upfront to the consumer.
• Costs advanced by the attorney (filing fees, expert costs, etc.).
• Fees recovered from the manufacturer through FDUTPA § 501.2105 and/or Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2).
• Backup percentage of recovery in some agreements.

Read your fee agreement carefully. Clean structures recover fees through fee-shifting only.

What courts look for in fee awards

When manufacturers contest fee amounts, Florida courts focus on:

• Hourly rates consistent with Florida legal market rates.
• Time entries for reasonable necessity.
• Duplication among multiple attorneys billing for the same work.
• Case complexity.
• Results obtained.

Reductions are typically modest (10-25%).

Why manufacturers don’t fight fees aggressively

Defense counsel’s incentive is to settle before fees accumulate. Once fees are substantial, the manufacturer’s combined exposure (damages + fees) makes settlement more attractive than litigation. Aggressive fee-fighting can backfire.

What about the Lemon Law arbitration?

Florida’s manufacturer arbitration and NMVA Board processes don’t include attorney-fee recovery. If you’re pursuing only the Lemon Law administrative path, you’re on your own for legal costs.

This is why many Florida lemon-law cases involve both tracks — Lemon Law for the substantive refund + civil-court FDUTPA/Magnuson-Moss for fees and damages.

The settlement breakdown

A typical settled Florida lemon-law case might distribute:

• Refund value (paid to consumer or lender): 55-70%.
• FDUTPA damages: 15-25%.
• Attorney fees and costs: 15-20%.

The consumer’s recovery is the first two components; attorney fees go directly to the lawyer.

Bottom line

Florida’s three-statute framework — Florida Lemon Law (substantive refund via arbitration) + FDUTPA (damages and attorney fees) + Magnuson-Moss (federal fees and federal-court access) — creates a comprehensive remedy package competitive with California’s framework. The fee-shifting math through FDUTPA and Magnuson-Moss is what makes Florida lemon-law cases economically viable for both consumers and the lemon-law plaintiff’s bar.

Related

Article

FDUTPA Damages in Florida Lemon Law Cases

How Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act provides actual damages, attorney fees, and potential punitive damages — the civil-court complement to the Lemon Law's arbitration remedies.

Read → Article

Refund Under Florida Lemon Law

The most common Florida Lemon Law remedy — full refund of the purchase price plus collateral charges, minus a reasonable allowance for use.

Read → Article

Repair-Only Orders Under Florida Lemon Law

Florida arbitrators can order the manufacturer to perform additional repairs in marginal cases — when the defect appears curable and full refund or replacement isn't warranted.

Read → Article

Replacement Vehicle Under Florida Lemon Law

Florida arbitration can order a comparable replacement vehicle as an alternative to a cash refund. When this is the right remedy and why most Florida buyers still choose refund.

Read →