FL findlemonlaw.com
Connecticut · Article Updated May 24, 2026

Attorney Fees Under Connecticut Lemon Law

Connecticut's fee-recovery framework — discretionary § 42-180 Lemon Law fees, the stronger CUTPA § 42-110g(d) hook, and Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2).

Connecticut provides three independent attorney-fee bases for prevailing consumers. Two of them — CUTPA and Magnuson-Moss — are reliably fee-shifting; the Lemon Law’s own provision is discretionary, which is why experienced Connecticut counsel plead CUTPA alongside the Lemon Law.

The three statutes

1. § 42-180 — Lemon Law fees (discretionary)

“…the court, in its discretion, may award to the plaintiff his costs and reasonable attorney’s fees…”

  • Discretionary (“may award”) — not automatic on prevailing, and the court may even award fees to the manufacturer if the action was brought without substantial justification.
  • Covers warranty claims connected to the Lemon Law under § 42-179.
  • Because it is discretionary, CUTPA § 42-110g(d) is the stronger fee hook in most cases.

2. § 42-110g(d) — CUTPA fees

“The court may award… reasonable attorney’s fees…”

  • Although “may,” courts treat as functionally mandatory for prevailing CUTPA plaintiffs.
  • Separate from Lemon Law fees — not duplicative.
  • 3-year CUTPA SOL.

3. § 2310(d)(2) — Magnuson-Moss fees

“If a consumer finally prevails… the court may allow… attorneys’ fees…”

  • Federal mandatory fee provision for prevailing consumers.
  • Provides D. Conn. federal court access.
  • 4-year SOL (borrowing CT UCC § 42a-2-725).

Why this matters for consumers

With CUTPA’s functionally mandatory fees plus the federal Magnuson-Moss provision, fee shifting means:

  • Attorneys take cases on contingent or hybrid basis — no out-of-pocket cost to consumer.
  • Manufacturer pays consumer’s full attorney fees + costs on prevailing.
  • Litigation economics favor consumer — manufacturer’s risk grows with discovery.
  • Settlement leverage is significant — manufacturer wants to limit fee exposure.

What the fee award covers

Recoverable fees typically include:

  • Hours billed by attorneys + paralegals.
  • Costs — filing fees, expert witnesses, deposition transcripts, copying.
  • Pre-suit work — demand letter drafting, DCP filing preparation.
  • Trial preparation — even if case settles.
  • Fee-petition work — attorney’s time spent litigating the fee award itself.

Fee award process

After prevailing on the merits:

  1. Attorney submits fee petition with detailed time records.
  2. Manufacturer objects to specific entries.
  3. Court reviews under reasonableness standard.
  4. Award entered — typically lodestar (hours × reasonable hourly rate) plus a multiplier in complex cases.

Reasonable hourly rates in Connecticut

Practice levelHartford / New HavenFairfield County
Senior consumer attorney$450 - $600$550 - $750
Mid-level associate$300 - $400$400 - $500
Paralegal$150 - $200$175 - $225

These rates vary by venue and case complexity.

CUTPA fees stacked with Lemon Law fees

§ 42-180 (discretionary) and § 42-110g(d) (functionally mandatory) provide separate fee bases. A consumer prevailing on both claims can seek fees under both — though courts typically apportion to avoid duplication. The CUTPA hook is what makes the fee award reliable.

Bottom line

Connecticut’s fee framework is strong because of CUTPA § 42-110g(d) and Magnuson-Moss § 2310(d)(2); the Lemon Law’s own § 42-180 fees are discretionary, so pleading CUTPA is essential. Combined with the DCP arbitration program (which doesn’t carry attorney fees but is low-cost) and court action, Connecticut consumers face minimal financial risk in pursuing a Lemon Law claim. Get a free case review to weigh your options.

Related

Think you've got a lemon?

Compare your situation to your state's requirements — and connect with a vetted lemon-law attorney for a free case review.